%0 Journal Article %J J Pain %D 2013 %T A blueprint of pain curriculum across prelicensure health sciences programs: one NIH Pain Consortium Center of Excellence in Pain Education (CoEPE) experience. %A Doorenbos, Ardith Z %A Gordon, Deborah B %A Tauben, David %A Palisoc, Jenny %A Drangsholt, Mark %A Lindhorst, Taryn %A Danielson, Jennifer %A Spector, June %A Ballweg, Ruth %A Vorvick, Linda %A Loeser, John D %K Curriculum %K Data Collection %K Humans %K National Institutes of Health (U.S.) %K Pain Clinics %K Pain Management %K Schools, Health Occupations %K United States %X

UNLABELLED: To improve U.S. pain education and promote interinstitutional and interprofessional collaborations, the National Institutes of Health Pain Consortium has funded 12 sites to develop Centers of Excellence in Pain Education (CoEPEs). Each site was given the tasks of development, evaluation, integration, and promotion of pain management curriculum resources, including case studies that will be shared nationally. Collaborations among schools of medicine, dentistry, nursing, pharmacy, and others were encouraged. The John D. Loeser CoEPE is unique in that it represents extensive regionalization of health science education, in this case in the region covering the states of Washington, Wyoming, Alaska, Montana, and Idaho. This paper describes a blueprint of pain content and teaching methods across the University of Washington's 6 health sciences schools and provides recommendations for improvement in pain education at the prelicensure level. The Schools of Dentistry and Physician Assistant provide the highest percentage of total required curriculum hours devoted to pain compared with the Schools of Medicine, Nursing, Pharmacy, and Social Work. The findings confirm the paucity of pain content in health sciences curricula, missing International Association for the Study of Pain curriculum topics, and limited use of innovative teaching methods such as problem-based and team-based learning.

PERSPECTIVE: Findings confirm the paucity of pain education across the health sciences curriculum in a CoEPE that serves a large region in the United States. The data provide a pain curriculum blueprint that can be used to recommend added pain content in health sciences programs across the country.

%B J Pain %V 14 %P 1533-8 %8 2013 Dec %G eng %N 12 %R 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.07.006 %0 Journal Article %J J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care %D 2012 %T Palliative care in the pediatric ICU: challenges and opportunities for family-centered practice. %A Doorenbos, Ardith %A Lindhorst, Taryn %A Starks, Helene %A Aisenberg, Eugene %A Curtis, J Randall %A Hays, Ross %K Child %K Humans %K Intensive Care Units, Pediatric %K Palliative Care %K Patient Care Team %K Patient Transfer %K Patient-Centered Care %K Pediatrics %K Professional Role %K Professional-Family Relations %K Terminal Care %K United States %X

The culture of pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) is focused on curative or life-prolonging treatments for seriously ill children. We present empirically-based approaches to family-centered palliative care that can be applied in PICUs. Palliative care in these settings is framed by larger issues related to the context of care in PICUs, the stressors experienced by families, and challenges to palliative care philosophy within this environment. Innovations from research on family-centered communication practices in adult ICU settings provide a framework for development of palliative care in PICUs and suggest avenues for social work support of critically ill children and their families.

%B J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care %V 8 %P 297-315 %8 2012 %G eng %N 4 %R 10.1080/15524256.2012.732461